This week, I met with Frank and Majaliwa again to continue sense-making and to plan for how to do further sense-making with the Malila community. I thought it was time to share a few of our initial observations, rather than just describe what we are doing. So here is a snapshot of what has emerged.
---
Having
the complete New Testament (NT) makes a difference: people (including church
leaders) are more motivated to use the Malila Scriptures now that they have the
complete NT. We also heard multiple testimonies of how much easier it is to
understand the Malila Scriptures than the Swahili Scriptures.
A
variety of materials are being engaged with: there were multiple stories
relating to not just print Scriptures, but also audio Scriptures, songs, the
Jesus film and literacy materials such as story books. However, deep and
consistent engagement was less obvious and distribution may need strengthening.
This was particularly noticeable in relation to audio Scriptures; although
people obviously enjoy them and they have contributed to people becoming Christians,
nearly all the outcomes relating to audio Scriptures involved people hearing
the audio on a one-off occasion, rather than being part of a regular listening
group. Also, the audio was always listened to via MegaVoice players, with no
evidence of the audio Scriptures spreading through other methods such as via
flash drives, social media etc.
Certain
people and workshops have led to the greatest impact: when assessing what
contributed to the outcomes we heard, the most significant contributions were
workshops (especially transition literacy teacher training and transition literacy/Bible
study workshops), the people trained through those workshops (especially a
handful of highly motivated individuals) and employed staff (literacy/SE
workers). This leads to questions over how effectively the community will
continue the work, now that there is no-one being paid to do it and SIL is no
long running workshops. It is hard for volunteers to find the time and money
needed to travel and advocate, distribute, teach etc. But it is also really
encouraging to see that workshops have worked! All the time and effort that
went into training colleagues and teaching in the community has borne fruit.
Church
leaders are the main ‘actors’ (where an actor refers to the person
demonstrating a change of behaviour): there were multiple testimonies relating
to pastors now using Malila Scriptures in church, teaching people to read,
showing the Jesus Film etc. This isn’t a surprise but it is encouraging, as our
SE strategy involved targeting church leaders, and others with leadership roles
in churches, because they are key influencers in the very churched area in
which we work.
---
There
is much more I could write, such as of seeing change at the community level of
people feeling freer to use their language in public, or of noticing possible
areas of need such as helping families hold devotional times together and
providing Bible teaching and study skills for church leaders etc. And there is
much to reflect on – what do these findings say about what we have done, what
we are doing and what we could be doing, both in the Malila language area and
elsewhere?
Our
next step is to do some of that reflection with the Malila community by meeting
with their NGO. The NGO originated from the Malila Language Committee, which
SIL encouraged to become officially registered as a community based
organisation. A number of the people we met with during the Outcome Harvesting
field trips were members of the NGO, so they already have some idea of what we
have been doing. We plan to explain further what we have been doing,
particularly talking about our goal of seeing transformation as people get to
know God better through His Word, and then do some sense-making with them. We
will do this by giving them half of the outcomes (using all of them would take
a long time, so instead we’ll select a representative sample) to group
according to the ‘significance’ scale and then discuss together which they
consider most significant and what that means for us. We also hope to share
some of our other observations with them, including some of the statistics, and
talk together about how these findings may influence their plans as an NGO.
SE Impact Chain
A
note about the SE Impact Chain (Materials > Reach (distribution) > Seeing/Hearing > Individuals changed > Community transformation.
All supported by the ‘legs’): as we tried to order the outcomes according to this
chain, we felt a need to add something in at the ‘Reach’ level, so we added in
a ‘Reach – knowledge’ category, so that reach was captured both in terms of distribution
of materials and sharing of knowledge (literacy teaching etc), as both contribute
to the next link in the chain.
A taste of the outcomes we harvested
A
couple of the outcome statements that seemed particularly significant to us as
a team:

Great to see the analysis starting to come together! I wonder if there is anyway (budget!) to keep supporting a network of 'scripture champions' - like a CoP, whatsapp group or something?
ReplyDeleteThanks. Interesting idea...though in a way, that is what the CBOs are about - theoretically they're groups of people who have a particular interest in and vision for keeping the flame burning. Your suggestion makes me wonder whether there would be anything to be gained by having a reunion of the former literacy/SE workers (like Majaliwa) to hear their stories of what continues to be done in their communities and to encourage each other. Hmmm. Something to ponder.
ReplyDeleteReally interesting update Katherine...thanks for sharing it!
ReplyDelete